APST Political Miscellany...
(too old to reply)
2018-05-27 04:10:56 UTC
On African migration. 'Eurafrica'.

The Marakesh Agreement...

Some in authority voice the end of the Welfare state.
2018-05-27 04:14:12 UTC
Malaysian election sends shockwaves across South-East Asia

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, 2018

The election of a coalition government headed by retired Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad marks the end of 61 years of one-party government in Malaysia, a rejection of corruption, and a clear signal that the people of Malaysia want a new direction for the predominantly Muslim country.

Fresh out of prison: Anwar Ibrahim

Since Malaysia broke with Singapore, the country has been run by the party that represented Malays and Islam, the Barisan Nasional. The party ran the country in the interests of ethnic Malays, who are overwhelmingly Muslim, and discriminated against minorities, whether Chinese, Indian or Christian, in business, government, the professions and education.

Dr Mahathir, now aged 92, served as Prime Minister of Malaysia from 1981 to 2003.

His tenure as Prime Minister was marked by rapid economic growth, until the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997–98, and an increasingly authoritarian style in which he ousted rivals within his own party, including his charismatic deputy, Anwar Ibrahim, whom he had arrested and charged with sodomy, a damning charge in a conservative Muslim society.

However, his term in government is still viewed favourably by most Malaysians.

Dr Mahathir fell out with his successors, most notably Najib Razak, who was Prime Minister from 2009 until his recent defeat.

Najib and his family have been accused of large-scale corruption, principally over a strategic investment fund owned by the government.

In 2015, Najib was accused by leading Western media of channelling over 2.67 billion ringgit (nearly $A892 million) from 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), a government-run strategic development company, to his personal bank accounts.

The money involved a joint venture with Saudi-owned oil company PetroSaudi. Najib claimed he had received the money as a gift from the Saudi Royal Family.

The government tried to hush up the scandal, but it would not go away.

On top of this, Najib introduced a 6 per cent GST, which principally affects low-income earners, provoking further hostility.

In 2015, Dr Mahathir established his own party, the Malaysian United Indigenous Party, which joined the opposition coalition, the Alliance of Hope. At the time of the election, Dr Mahathir was chairman of the Alliance, and the imprisoned former Deputy Prime Minister, Anwar Ibrahim, was described as “leader”.

The Alliance of Hope has over 120 seats in the new Malaysian lower house, while the Barisan Nasional has about 100.

As the Alliance of Hope represents a number of parties, whose views represent everything from secular to political Islam – and were united mainly by their opposition to the former government – it will be difficult to get them to speak with one voice, particularly against a cohesive opposition.

Pivotal to this transition will be Dr Mahathir and Anwar Ibrahim, who was released from prison after the election.

While Dr Mahathir was crucial to legitimising the new government, at the age of 92 he is clearly an interim leader. He has already indicated that he will step down as Prime Minister in favour of Anwar Ibrahim in due course.

Anwar is a devout Muslim, and has made clear that he is vehemently opposed to corruption, which has become a way of life in Malaysia. He has also repeatedly stated that he is totally committed to the rule of law, strongly supports pluralist democracy, and opposes the politicisation of Islam.

One of his most cogent articles appeared in Time magazine on September 12, 2012. Under the title, “Who hijacked Islam?” Anwar condemned the terrorist organisation founded by Osama bin Laden, and said it had set back the course of democracy in the Muslim world by decades.

“Never in Islam’s history have the actions of so few of its followers caused the religion and its community of believers to be such an abomination in the eyes of others,” he said.

“One is therefore perturbed by the confusion among Muslims who res­ponded to the attack with a misplaced diatribe against the U.S. In Malaysia, the government-controlled media have been deployed to stir up anti-American sentiments, while members of the poli­tical elite use a different language for international diplomacy …

“The need for Muslim societies to address their internal social and political development has become more urgent than ever. Economic development alone is clearly insufficient: it creates its own tensions in the social and political spheres, which must be addressed. A proper orientation must be developed for Muslim engagement with the world at large.”

He concluded: “For more than 100 years, the Muslim world has had to grapple with the problem of modernity. Of greatest urgency is the effort to inculcate an intellectual and political orientation that promotes democracy and openness.

“Intellectuals and politicians must have the courage to condemn fanaticism in all its forms. But they must, in the same breath, equally condemn the tyrants and oppressive regimes that dash every hope of peaceful change.”

He will now have to deliver on these lofty convictions.
2018-05-27 04:15:36 UTC
Sounds about right in its general assessment...

Wall Street & the November 1917 Bolshevik Revolution
Kerry Bolton

Lenin-Hammer6,964 words

My last article documented the funding of the March 1917 Revolution in Russia.[1] The primary financier of the Russian revolutionary movement 1905–1917 was Jacob Schiff, of Kuhn Loeb and Co., New York. In particular Schiff had provided the money for the distribution of revolutionary propaganda among Russians prisoners-of-war in Japan in 1905 by the American journalist George Kennan who, more than any other individual, was responsible for turning American public and official opinion against Czarist Russia. Kennan subsequently related that it was thanks to Schiff that 50,000 Russian soldiers were revolutionized and formed the cadres that laid the basis for the March 1917 Revolution and, we might add–either directly or indirectly–the consequent Bolshevik coup of November. The reaction of bankers from Wall Street and The City towards the overthrow of the Czar was enthusiastic.

This article deals with the funding of the subsequent Bolshevik coup eight months later which, as paradoxical as it might seem to those who know nothing of history other than the orthodox version, was also greeted cordially by banking circles in Wall Street and elsewhere.

Apologists for the bankers and other highly-placed individuals who supported the Bolsheviks from the earliest stages of the communist takeover, either diplomatically or financially, justify the support for this mass application of psychopathology as being motivated by patriotic sentiment, in trying to thwart German influence over the Bolsheviks and to keep Russia in the war against Germany. Because Lenin and his entourage had been able to enter Russia courtesy of the German High Command on the basis that a Bolshevik regime would withdraw Russia from the war, Wall Street capitalists explained that their patronage of the Bolsheviks was motivated by the highest ideals of pro-Allied sentiment. Hence, William Boyce Thompson in particular stated that by funding Bolshevik propaganda for distribution in Germany and Austria this would undermine the war effort of those countries, while his assistance to the Bolsheviks in Russia was designed to swing them in favor of the Allies.

These protestations of patriotic motivations ring hollow. International banking is precisely what it is called–international, or globalist as such forms of capitalism are now called. Not only have these banking forms and other forms of big business had overlapping directorships and investments for generations, but they are often related through intermarriage. While Max Warburg of the Warburg banking house in Germany advised the Kaiser and while the German Government arranged for funding and safe passage of Lenin and his entourage from Switzerland across Germany to Russia;[2] his brother Paul,[3] a partner of Jacob Schiff’s at Wall Street, looked after the family interests in New York. The primary factor that was behind the bankers’ support for the Bolsheviks whether from London,[4] New York, Stockholm,[5] or Berlin, was to open up the underdeveloped resources of Russia to the world market, just as in our own day George Soros, the money speculator, funds the so-called “color revolutions” to bring about “regime change” that facilitates the opening up of resources to global exploitation. Hence there can no longer be any doubt that international capital a plays a major role in fomenting revolutions, because Soros plays the well-known modern-day equivalent of Jacob Schiff.

Recognition of Bolsheviks Pushed by Bankers

This aim of international finance, whether centered in Germany, England or the USA, to open up Russia to capitalist exploitation by supporting the Bolsheviks, was widely commented on at the time by a diversity of well-informed sources, including Allied intelligence agencies, and of particular interest by two very different individuals, Henry Wickham Steed, editor of The London Times, and Samuel Gompers, head of the American Federation of Labor.

On May 1, 1922 The New York Times reported that Gompers, reacting to negotiations at the international economic conference at Genoa, declared that a group of “predatory international financiers” were working for the recognition of the Bolshevik regime for the opening up of resources for exploitation. Despite the rhetoric by New York and London bankers during the war that a Russian revolution would serve the Allied cause, Gompers opined that this was an “Anglo-American-German banking group,” and that they were “international bankers” who did not adhere to any national allegiance. He also noted that prominent Americans who had a history of anti-labor attitudes were advocating recognition of the Bolshevik regime.[6]
Read full, well documented article @ https://www.counter-currents.com/2013/10/wall-street-and-the-november-1917-bolshevik-revolution/
2018-05-27 04:16:42 UTC
European Court Estimates Over 90 Million EU Residents Are First- or Second-Generation Migrants

2018-05-27 04:18:20 UTC
The "Soviet" Origin of Hate-Speech Laws...

The Sordid Origin of Hate-Speech Laws
by Jacob Mchangama
Thursday, December 1, 2011

All western european countries have hate-speech laws. In 2008, the eu adopted a framework decision on “Combating Racism and Xenophobia” that obliged all member states to criminalize certain forms of hate speech. On the other side of the Atlantic, the Supreme Court of the United States has gradually increased and consolidated the protection of hate speech under the First Amendment. The European concept of freedom of expression thus prohibits certain content and viewpoints, whereas, with certain exceptions, the American concept is generally concerned solely with direct incitement likely to result in overt acts of lawlessness.

Yet the origin of hate-speech laws has been largely forgotten. The divergence between the United States and European countries is of comparatively recent origin. In fact, the United States and the vast majority of European (and Western) states were originally opposed to the internationalization of hate-speech laws. European states and the U.S. shared the view that human rights should protect rather than limit freedom of expression.

Rather, the introduction of hate-speech prohibitions into international law was championed in its heyday by the Soviet Union and allies. Their motive was readily apparent. The communist countries sought to exploit such laws to limit free speech.

As Americans, Europeans and others contemplate the dividing line emerging on the extent to which free speech should be limited to criminalize the “defamation of religions” and “Islamophobia,” launched by the member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (oic) since 1999, they should bear this forgotten history in mind. However well-intended—and its initial proponents were anything but well-intended—the Western acceptance of hate-speech laws severely limits the ability of liberal democracies to counter attempts to broaden the scope of hate-speech laws under international human rights law, with potentially devastating consequences for the preservation of free speech.

Freedom of expression and hate speech

The (nonbinding) universal Declaration of Human Rights (udhr) adopted in 1948 does not include an explicit duty to prohibit hate speech. Article 19 simply secures “freedom of opinion and expression.” However, the drafting history shows that the issues of hate-speech regulation and restrictions on free speech were frequently discussed. During the negotiation of Article 19, the drafters faced the challenge of whether, and if so to what extent, freedom of expression should tolerate even intolerance.
The majority of states favored a robust protection of free speech such as that set out in a U.S. proposal (un Doc. e/cn. 4/21), which read “there shall be freedom of speech, of the press and of expression by any means whatsoever.” However, the Soviet Union continuously proposed various amendments aimed at prohibiting expressions of intolerance.

The first uk proposal on the wording of an article aimed at securing freedom of expression recognized, like the Soviet proposal, the possibility for states to limit this right, in the interests of national security, against incitement to violence and disorder and obscene publications, whereas the uk proposal expressed doubts about the possibility of including publications aimed at suppressing human rights. But the uk did recognize a danger that

these words would afford a wider power for the limitation of freedom of publication than is necessary or desirable,” they found “that it would be inconsistent for a Bill of Rights whose whole object is to establish human rights and fundamental freedoms to prevent any Government, if it wished to do so, from taking steps against publications whose whole object was to destroy the rights and freedoms which it is the purpose of the Bill to establish.

At first glance this proposal may seem wholly reconcilable with the efforts of the Soviet Union. Yet two elements of the uk position differed crucially from the Soviet one. First, the uk stated that “the right of Governments to impose the necessary restrictions . . . is to be interpreted as strictly confined to such publications as advocate the use of violence,” and second, that “no Government is obliged by the Bill to make use of the powers of limitation.” In other words, the limitations on free speech advocated by the uk were, first, with a few exceptions, dependent on the advocacy of violence, and thus mere expressions of intolerance would not in themselves be punishable, and, second, held that there should be no human rights obligation to prohibit such expression.
Read on at: https://www.hoover.org/research/sordid-origin-hate-speech-laws

The "Soviet" Union was also the first in the modern era to displace the majority population en mass by shipping in suitable alien displacers and shipping out (to Siberia) recalcitrant (etc) members of the native majority. They did this in Russia, but also in the - acquired - Baltic states.

They also used many of the German Concentration Camps (mainly set up in conditions of war) for decades later to deal with recalcitrants and the enormous collateral numbers who looked sideways..
2018-05-27 04:20:05 UTC
Starbuck's new business proposal...

The Irish Savant
Monday, 21 May 2018
New business proposal
How about this for a mouth-watering business plan? You sell crap coffee for twice the normal price in a place that doubles as a homeless shelter where 'all are welcome' whether or not they buy anything. While they join a long queue waiting for their order to be fulfilled customers can take in gangs of black teenagers chimping out, junkies shooting up at the tables and savour the juicy aroma wafting from the bathroom as a homeless man, whose earlier meal came from a nearby dumpster, relieves himself on the floor. This kind of thing:

Not exactly calculated to set the pulses of a would-be investor racing, is it? Yet that represents Starbucks' new business strategy, developed following the Rittenhouse Square Massacre where two black non-customers were, in line with company policy, asked to leave unless they made a purchase. When they refused they were subsequently removed - with no use of force - by local police. An everyday occurrence in this type of business you'd imagine. But in this instance it became an overnight national scandal.

To the extent that Starbucks have now fundamentally revised their customer policies, declaring their dining and bathroom facilities 'open to all' whether they're paying customers or not. Now for sure I have nothing but contempt for corporations that virtue signal about equality while paying their 'partners' subsistence wages (exemplar: Amazon) or tech companies that trumpet their commitment to diversity while employing virtually no blacks (exemplar: Google). But in this instance it does seem as if Starbucks have literally put their money where their mouth is. This move - if followed through - will inevitably have a major, and possibly irrecoverable, impact on their bottom line. If they don't follow through a storm of negative publicity is sure to follow so they lose either way.

I don't get it.
2018-05-27 09:37:34 UTC

Germany: Mohamed ‘Most Popular Baby Name’ in Bremen
By William on May 6, 2018 @PunishedWilliam

The Free Hanseatic City of Bremen has won the unfortunate accolade of being the first Federal State in Germany in which the Arabic name Mohamed is now the most popular for newborn boys.

Whilst Maximilian, Paul and Alexander were 2017’s most popular boy’s names for Germany as a whole, Bremen’s babies have a distinctly Islamic flavour. Mohamed is officially the state’s most popular baby name – despite being a lowly 68th in Germany as a whole.

This reflects the demographic trends of Bremen. As of 2015, 16% of the State’s population were foreign nationals, whilst 29.4% were of a non-German ethnic origin.

Mohammed is already the 3rd most popular baby name in Vienna, whilst totalling up the variants of the name in England places it at the helm of most popular name for newborn boys.

And whilst the Gesellschaft für Deutsche Sprache explains that the name Mohamed has seen a ‘rapid rise in popularity’ in recent years in Germany, a report by Die Welt suggests that the variants of Mohammed added together would have made the name the 5th most popular in 2014 – prior to Germany admitting 4 million mostly Muslim immigrants.
2018-05-28 00:41:00 UTC
On the Irish abortion referendum...

Irish PM: 'A quiet revolution has taken place'

He makes up for the lack of Irish looks by laying on the (Irish) brogue.
2018-05-28 11:45:14 UTC
Again on the "Royal" marriage (of the bastard with the American...

The Irish Savant
Sunday, 27 May 2018
Royal negrolatry
How many of you remember Sarah Ferguson, the erstwhile Duchess of York, ex-wife of Prince Andrew? More specifically the endless hounding she suffered from the MSM almost from the beginning? She was excoriated for being a promiscuous spendthrift from an 'ordinary' family whose father was a mere Army Major. Despite being basically a decent girl married to a guy with very dodgy sexual predilections she was always the Bad One. And of course she had ginger hair and a freckly face.

Contrast that with the unalloyed reverence and veneration which Meghan Markle has enjoyed from the very beginning. Yet compared to her Fergie has been a model of chastity, good breeding and dignity. Albeit with ginger hair and freckly skin. In saner times Markel would have seen as the Bad Princess straight from central casting, would have been hard to imagine anyone less worthy of becoming part of the Royal House of Windsor.

After all she's mixed-race, comes from a ghetto in LA, her deeply embarrassing family (her father selling personal photos, a cousin wedding guest stopped entry to a nightclub for trying to smuggle in a knife) all seem to hate her despite using her new status to make money for themselves. Thomas Markle Jr describes his sister in an open letter to the Prince as a "jaded, shallow, conceited woman that will make a joke of you and the royal family heritage. As more time passes to your royal wedding, it became very clear that this is the biggest mistake in royal wedding history. Meghan Markle is obviously not the right woman for you."

Shortly after this the Royal in-law was arrested for allegedly holding a gun to a woman's head during a drunken argument

And the 'Princess' herself? Rode the cock carousel so hard that its bearings must have flamed out at some stage. Was a soft-porn actress (see her Royal Highness above thrusting her naked butt into the air for all to see), and in an inspired piece of casting, played a prostitute in Beverly Hills, 90210 in which she 'performed an intimate act' on screen in broad daylight. One of her countless 'boyfriends' was porn-star Simon Rex (lower picture). Sheer class.

Yet the gushing feelgood fantasy story continues unabated. Another institution bites the dust in the Long March Through The Institutions.
2018-05-28 11:46:58 UTC
Post by t***@yahoo.com.au
Again on the "Royal" marriage (of the bastard with the American...
The Irish Savant
Sunday, 27 May 2018
Royal negrolatry
How many of you remember Sarah Ferguson, the erstwhile Duchess of York, ex-wife of Prince Andrew? More specifically the endless hounding she suffered from the MSM almost from the beginning? She was excoriated for being a promiscuous spendthrift from an 'ordinary' family whose father was a mere Army Major. Despite being basically a decent girl married to a guy with very dodgy sexual predilections she was always the Bad One. And of course she had ginger hair and a freckly face.
Contrast that with the unalloyed reverence and veneration which Meghan Markle has enjoyed from the very beginning. Yet compared to her Fergie has been a model of chastity, good breeding and dignity. Albeit with ginger hair and freckly skin. In saner times Markel would have seen as the Bad Princess straight from central casting, would have been hard to imagine anyone less worthy of becoming part of the Royal House of Windsor.
After all she's mixed-race, comes from a ghetto in LA, her deeply embarrassing family (her father selling personal photos, a cousin wedding guest stopped entry to a nightclub for trying to smuggle in a knife) all seem to hate her despite using her new status to make money for themselves. Thomas Markle Jr describes his sister in an open letter to the Prince as a "jaded, shallow, conceited woman that will make a joke of you and the royal family heritage. As more time passes to your royal wedding, it became very clear that this is the biggest mistake in royal wedding history. Meghan Markle is obviously not the right woman for you."
Shortly after this the Royal in-law was arrested for allegedly holding a gun to a woman's head during a drunken argument
And the 'Princess' herself? Rode the cock carousel so hard that its bearings must have flamed out at some stage. Was a soft-porn actress (see her Royal Highness above thrusting her naked butt into the air for all to see), and in an inspired piece of casting, played a prostitute in Beverly Hills, 90210 in which she 'performed an intimate act' on screen in broad daylight. One of her countless 'boyfriends' was porn-star Simon Rex (lower picture). Sheer class.
Yet the gushing feelgood fantasy story continues unabated. Another institution bites the dust in the Long March Through The Institutions.
2018-05-28 12:23:13 UTC
stringybark Mon 28 May 2018 04:03:39 pm

It has been revealed that the Federal Agriculture Minister David Littleproud effectively blocked the prosecution of Emanuels for their disastrous shipment of sheep to the Middle East in 2017. He refused to hand over information to the WA Department of Agriculture that would have led this company being prosecuted. It is obvious Emanuels can do anything and escape prosecution. It is for this reason the pressure to stop live exports will end the trade. The shonks like Emanuel can do whatever they like safe in the knowledge they have the best politicians money can buy.

ThePhantom Mon 28 May 2018 04:17:37 pm
How did you escape Bega?

Flysa Mon 28 May 2018 04:21:50 pm
The Vatican I believe.

The Shadow Mon 28 May 2018 04:23:01 pm
By the darkness of a moonless night.
He then hid in a cave in Tasmania for a year until things started to cool down.

.ED Mon 28 May 2018 05:18:03 pm

ThePhantom Mon 28 May 2018 04:17:37 pm
How did you escape Bega?

Flysa Mon 28 May 2018 04:21:50 pm
The Vatican I believe.

The Shadow Mon 28 May 2018 04:23:01 pm
By the darkness of a moonless night.
He then hid in a cave in Tasmania for a year until things started to cool down.

stringybark Mon 28 May 2018 05:24:34 pm
So fantom can add nothing sensible but troll.

.ED Mon 28 May 2018 05:26:28 pm
Ignore the old dish lickers stringy.Thats a good post

.ED Mon 28 May 2018 05:28:12 pm
They don't even try to pretend anymore......The fatom has been outed as the beast of Ballina.NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.......hahahahahahaha

saiIor Mon 28 May 2018 05:34:37 pm
Who are the directors and financiers of Emanuels please. Do they have relatives in government positions please. In the old days I would be researching such details but have no time anymore. Thanking in advance.

stringybark Mon 28 May 2018 05:36:25 pm
Some rich bloke in Perth owns it.

saiIor Mon 28 May 2018 05:38:04 pm
A rich bloke in perth? Must be a crook then. Thanks.

stringybark Mon 28 May 2018 05:42:19 pm
Graham Daws. Don't know anything about him except he seems to have a charmed life compared to Wellards who have been prosecuted. One of the Wellard mangers given a suspended sentence and fine last week. Fares are considered the best operators.

.ED Mon 28 May 2018 05:44:45 pm
Hey the Fatom shouldn't you be posting as Old jacktar or Max Bilney/Max Bilneys dead sister or whatever 'The shadow' has come up with today. Or ?Or?.....Hahahahahahaah....Oh yeah thats right you didn't GOOGLE your New/Old Alter....IDIOT......Sloppy work Viv..Why bother changing Alters between The Fatom and The Shadow accounts old girl? We can all see through it.Dishlickers

.ED Mon 28 May 2018 05:49:25 pm
I said you must be a lebbo the other day after trying Unsuccessfully to Re Birth your old Parked up Old Jacktar Alter ...This is Australia Viv...Three on one is not Acceptable.Flysa as your a POM you wouldn't understand old girl.

saiIor Mon 28 May 2018 05:54:31 pm

saiIor Mon 28 May 2018 05:56:54 pm
Suspended sentence? WOW! Them Daws' sure pack a punch.

dusty Mon 28 May 2018 05:57:46 pm
"The Vatican I believe." Yes, the ratline. Half ended up here, half in Latin America. Have known a few and their offspring. Still unapologetic.

saiIor Mon 28 May 2018 06:00:12 pm
dusty, it's a deadly game with such arrogant smiling terrorists

dusty Mon 28 May 2018 06:04:20 pm
What's her name...that well presented NP minister...Fiona Nash said that they (mainly WA) should be given 5 years to restructure and then it should stop.

.ED Mon 28 May 2018 06:08:43 pm
Excuse me..... this thread has become about Stringybarks RIGHT to comment without being trolled Three on one by the usual Dish licking old lezo's .

81Alpha Mon 28 May 2018 06:09:13 pm
Fiona Nash and Susan Ley are grandstanding. The majority of sheep for the live trade come from Western Australia a,d their electorates would contain very few, if any, sheep farmers that supply the live trade.

saiIor Mon 28 May 2018 06:11:46 pm
81, you know the Daws' and their cheap shit illegal boats carting Aussie sheep? Hmmm?

dusty Mon 28 May 2018 06:18:53 pm
"Grandstanding"???? It was a political statement that made sense. Sheep ought to be slaughtered and butchered here. Australian jobs..81A?

dusty Mon 28 May 2018 06:19:28 pm
Then frozen trade to ME.

stringybark Mon 28 May 2018 06:34:30 pm
Don McGaughie (sp) came out against the live trade last week because of the damage it was dong our reputation. It's becoming obvious nothing will change as long as the Awassi Express and ships like it continue to operate.

.ED Mon 28 May 2018 07:06:21 pm
Thanks for the help .ED...your welcome stringybark.

81Alpha Mon 28 May 2018 07:08:56 pm
Dusty, it's an inconvenient truth that the fiercely militant Australia Meat Worker's Union priced the domestic meat industry out of the market place years ago, and, as for Australian jobs, most of the employees in what's left of the industry are on 457 visa's.

saiIor Mon 28 May 2018 07:11:38 pm
dusty, 81A is a british scumbag, like gillard and abbott, 81A doesn't give a fuck abboutt Australian jobs.
They never have and never will. It's all about enslaving Australians by stealing all resources. They have succeeded so it's all over bar a revolution. A nasty revolution.

81Alpha Mon 28 May 2018 07:12:40 pm
Oh, and before anyone cites the New Zealand success at frozen exports, wages are lower in New Zealand, and the New Zealand taxpayer subsidizes the meat industry.

saiIor Mon 28 May 2018 07:12:58 pm
81A, you're a nasty fucking evil English fucking grub. I couldn't put it more eloquently.

81Alpha Mon 28 May 2018 07:16:44 pm
Fuck off, sailor, I was fouling the bore of an M60 when you were fouling your nappy.

dusty Mon 28 May 2018 07:19:57 pm
"most of the employees in what's left of the industry are on 457 visa's" True 81A. I've seen it in the bush. So, as with everything we are now dealing with is a complex of issues brought about in large part by giving foreign multinationals (Conagra &etc) the right to access Australian displacing cooly labour at will - let us be assured - on their own terms because this must weaken the unions. Otherwise, why do they wail so much about it? I'd like to see inside these contracts. Failing that, or some other cogent evidence of wage rates, I suspend judgement.

dusty Mon 28 May 2018 07:22:34 pm
I take your point about the influence among the English immigrant community of the Manchester School and the "the Colonies" mentality, sea man. But I take each one case by case.

dusty Mon 28 May 2018 07:25:46 pm
The British Empire (aka The Bank of England &etc) tirelessly sought to impose cooly labour on Australia for over 100 years, like they did to ALL the rest of their colonies. We outflanked them every time. It's a cruel irony that the contemporary Left support the Empire's mission.

stringybark Mon 28 May 2018 07:28:59 pm
Yes, thanks for your help ED.

saiIor Mon 28 May 2018 07:29:50 pm
Ah yes, the "fuck off, sailor", part, unfortunately, where the truth really hits hard.

stringybark Mon 28 May 2018 07:38:20 pm
Meat processing in Australia is not pretty. Very rich owners making bags of money while trying to pay their workers as little as possible. Families like the Thomas's and Teys are mega rich. Prime steers go in at $2.80 a kilo live weight and come out the end at $20 - $ 40 a kilo. Everyone along the chain whines they're not making any money but it's going somewhere. Most works are 457 Korean, or Sudanese or Afghan migrants, not many of the old Australian meat workers any more.

saiIor Mon 28 May 2018 07:47:39 pm
81Alpha is on a 457, and, evidently, " fouling the bore" at the same time. Gotta give it to these infiltrating british scumbags, they come from far and wide.

.ED Mon 28 May 2018 08:17:02 pm
Fouling the bore????

81Alpha Mon 28 May 2018 08:47:01 pm
"Fouling the bore" - by firing one.
2018-05-29 09:21:57 UTC
'Germany rules Italy!' Italian reveals REAL reason behind rise of euroscepticism in Rome

Scroll down for videos & text.
2018-06-09 23:23:09 UTC
The Irish Savant

Friday, 8 June 2018
Some reflections on Ireland's abortion referendum
The victory of 'progressive' forces in the recent referendum has been hailed by the chattering classes, media whores and Good Whites everywhere as a decisive victory for democracy. And indeed it was, no arguments about that. Odd then that the very people eulogising the voice of the people in the Irish Republic, and warning against any backsliding by the Government in fulfilling their democratically-expressed wishes, recommend an entirely different approach in the other part of Ireland. You see abortion legislation in Northern Ireland is much more restrictive than on the British mainland, and polls show consistently that this is what its people want.

So one quick somersault later and the luvvies are demanding that 'the tyranny of the majority' be ended. By legislation from Westminster if necessary. Shadow Attorney General Shami Charkrabarty (are there any actual British people left at the top levels of law enforcement?) says “You can’t have democracy without fundamental human rights, and the women of Northern Ireland have suffered for long enough", adding that Labour is “looking at legislative options” in Westminster to force a more liberal abortion regime on the Ulster knuckle-draggers.

Yes, as we knew all along, the democratic will of the people is paramount ..... until it comes up with the wrong result. Just ask Viktor Orban.

Our Prime Minister Leo Varadker took personal credit for the success of the referendum declaring it 'the day we came of age as a country, the day we took our place among the nations of the world'. Well now Leo, what exactly do you mean by 'we'? Like, I can't imagine that Ireland has too many more Indian Hindu homosexuals on whose behalf you can speak. And fuck your impertinence in dismissing the Ireland prior to your coronation in such derogatory terms. For many years Ireland has been in the very highest cohort of nations when it comes to life expectancy, standard of living, education, freedom, democracy and general human rights.

Now in comparison take a country like, well, India, a billion people shitting on the ground, turds everywhere you step, rivers filled with shit and bathing humans, millions dying of starvation and treatable disease every year, eye-watering corruption, dead bodies floating in rivers while mangy dogs feast on their corpse, where brides with insufficient dowries are burnt alive. Whereas Ireland currently ranks 8th in the UN's Human Development Index India languishes at a 131, along side such human rights luminaries as Tajikistan and the Congo.

So Leo, if you really want to help a country take its place among the nations of the world head back to the land of your fathers and get to work.
2018-06-11 04:41:40 UTC
For what died the Sons of Roisin?

2018-06-12 02:56:14 UTC
More behind this than meets the eye...

Dennis Rodman gets emotional after Trump-Kim summit

2018-06-12 23:52:43 UTC
No Man Is Illegal
by Maxwell Foret on May 10, 2018

I was one of five men who had spent weeks cleaning up a long-abandoned city building cluttered with trash and debris from collapsing infrastructure. Our project to open a soup kitchen to help support the local community of illiterate migrants and mentally ill homeless people was nearing completion.

While loading chunks of broken concrete from a pile of rubble into my hauling bucket, I noticed a strange luminescent lamp laying on its side. The lamp seemed sturdy and I rubbed off its grime to reveal a golden surface embossed with intricate designs. It rumbled violently and large blue genie burst out before me and began levitating.

With a booming voice he told me that my unselfish actions had freed him from centuries of systemic oppression and now he would reward me with three wishes.

Most people wish for love or world peace but with my first wish I asked to be made immensely wealthy — not for my own purposes of course, as I don’t care much for money, but so I could buy my mom a house and ostentatiously donate to food shelters and asinine social causes that make me feel superior to the hopelessly impoverished.

The genie nodded that he understood my brave wish, closed his eyes, hummed loudly, and a few seconds later many billions were now mine to use for any purpose I deemed ethical. Looking around, it seemed nothing much had changed with the world. Some numbers in a bank account were different and I had stacks of paper and gold sitting somewhere, but everything else seemed normal. I took a deep breath and kept going.

For my second wish, I looked the genie deep in his vacant eyes and told him I wished that no man was illegal. He snickered derisively at me before clearing his throat and looking down to regain his composure. He then continued with the customary gesture of waving his hands magically and acknowledged my command had been fulfilled.

It turned out this time there were a few side effects I hadn’t considered. For example, I had failed to consider that a nation’s only lasting wealth is its people and that capabilities for civilization among populations differ greatly, so borders have historically acted as a bank vault storing the wealth of nations by securing their population. Also, being accustomed to first world standards, I had assumed these were normal and natural throughout the world, which turned out not to be the case at all.

With no man illegal, nations were rendered borderless and those with civilization were immediately flooded by low-IQ high time preference third worlders trying to get to where people had built something good. It was quite a shock to find out 90% of the world is a disaster of poor people with low intelligence barely able to figure out food, clothing, and shelter, and almost entirely unable to plan or organize.

During a sober moment, they looked around at their countrymen, realized they would never develop civilization, and decided the best course of action was to flee their homelands to get away from the mass of people possessing the same traits as themselves, which in the aggregate had created their national conditions of colossal failure.

The previously successful nations that were now borderless quickly lost their unity and shared notion of common sense in the frenzied greed of peasant fantasies where each took as much as they could while shirking responsibilities and accountability. It was looting in slow motion.

This worldwide revolution made history obsolete by removing divisions between the people who developed nations and those who wanted to enjoy what was beyond their station. Developments that took hardy people many centuries to achieve found their nourishing populations replaced by millions of incapables unable to keep civilization afloat. Worst of all, because they knew they were intruding squatters unable to achieve basic standards, the migrants hated the natives for their abilities and openly wished for their downfall.

Wealthy nations became poor overnight and the work of good people was diverted to trying to fix problems created by the imported population. Some natives tried to build a nation within a nation in an effort to preserve their culture and its essential aspects that now struggled under the weight of chaotic disunity. Infrastructure and institutions could no longer manage clean up on the messes of outsiders, and even after sacrificing the possibility of keeping a high level of culture, there was not enough wealth and energy to hold things together. A free fall to a sustainable third world standard ensued.

With my third wish, I asked the genie to restore lawful borders. He snickered again and this time I felt silly from the realization that I needed an appointment at the laser removal clinic to take care of that embarrassing leftist slogan tattoo that seemed so edgy when I was a teenager.
2018-06-17 01:31:15 UTC
On what motivates groups...

Best read at site:

June 13, 2018
Now that Trump has solved Northeast Asia's problems, maybe he can get to a problem in our country -- in fact, within 10 miles of the White House. For some reason, The Washington Post recently ran an article on something important -- the MS-13 gang presence at a public school on the outskirts of our nation's capital, William Wirt Middle School in Prince George's County, Maryland.

The media's usual approach to the diversity being inflicted on us is: Don't report this! It's better if no one knows. Maybe the left has decided it's too late to do anything about the transformation of our country into a Third World hellhole, and Trump couldn't stop it even if he wanted to.

The Post reported that, like many schools up and down the East Coast, MS-13 has turned Wirt into a battleground. There have been near-daily gang fights, rampant drug dealing, one reported rape, gang signs on the walls, one shooting -- more in nearby schools -- and teachers afraid to be alone with their students. At least two students are required to have security officers assigned to them, walking them from class to class and watching them during lunch hour, on account of MS-13 threatening to kill them.

How many different categories of immigrants require special law enforcement officers devoted to them? Thanks to mass Muslim immigration, the FBI has terrorist watch lists in ALL 50 STATES. That's why whenever there's a terrorist attack, the FBI says, Oh yeah, we were watching that guy. And now we have police bodyguards for kids at schools wherever "unaccompanied minors" have been dumped by our government.

In addition to the free school lunches, transportation, housing and health care to pay for all this wonderful diversity, immigrants are also massively ratcheting up law enforcement costs.

It would be enraging enough if bad things were happening to our country and the immigrants were paying for it. But we're paying for it. Wait -- you are offering to bring gang warfare, drug cartels and terrorism? We'll go top dollar for that! Put your wallet away! Your money's no good here!

Having made the odd decision to report factual information about immigration, The Washington Post was careful to include the gigantically irrelevant, painfully idiotic cliche: The "vast majority" of poor Latin Americans pouring into our country "enroll in school and stay out of trouble."

Yes, and the vast majority of boa constrictors stay out of trouble too. Let's put them in our schools! In fact, far fewer boa constrictors kill Americans each year than Latin American immigrants do. Less than one a year. And boa constrictors don't undercut you at the construction site.

We never hear that "vast majority" argument about the policies that liberals like. The "vast majority" of gun owners never shoot up a school. The "vast majority" of smokers will never get lung cancer. The "vast majority" of Americans do not benefit from Wall Street profits.

Why are we subjecting ourselves to mass immigration at all? Hey, everyone, let's all get an HIV injection! Don't worry, the vast majority of us won't get AIDS!

We're certainly not doing it to be nice to Hispanics. They've been polled and polled and polled, and it turns out they DON'T want more people being brought in to take their jobs and drive down wages. Recent immigrants probably don't want their useless brother-in-law from Chiapas sleeping on the couch either.

In the 2012 presidential campaign, Obama's Spanish language ads didn't make a peep about immigration. Instead, he bragged about giving everyone free health care. (Sidebar: Unmentioned were the millions of people who lost their health care, thanks to all that free health care for immigrants.)

Less than two years ago, Republicans watched the most anti-immigrant politician in a century be elected president, with every major institution in America against him. Trump won more of the Hispanic vote than any Republican in a generation.

The Chamber of Commerce knows that Hispanics didn't come here to have their wages driven down by an unending stream of unskilled workers just like themselves. Republicans and Democrats know it. The only people who don't know it are Americans who don't want to hurt anyone's feelings by opposing the constant importation of unskilled, poverty-stricken immigrants.

The reason for this transformation of our country, our culture and our politics is to flood the market with low-wage workers and Democratic voters. Obviously, those are losing arguments, so the beneficiaries of mass Third World immigration lie. They claim that anyone who doesn't want to supply the rich with cheap labor must hate Hispanics.

Trump thought North Korea was hard? With immigration, we have all of the most influential forces in our culture on the same page. Immigration is a great unifier of the rich and powerful.

The rich are like sharks -- all appetite, no brain. With their cheap labor voting 7-3 for the Democrats, it won't be long until Democrats have a lock on government. What do you think they'll do then, Business Roundtable? Answer: Make it impossible to do business. Google "California."

With the Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable and the Koch brothers' incessant lobbying for more and more cheap labor, we see exactly what Lenin said about the capitalists: They will sell us the rope with which to hang them.

The rich don't care. They can't think beyond next quarter's earnings.
2018-06-21 03:08:11 UTC
EXCLUSIVE: Scandal-hit Senator Lucy Gichuhi was taken to court a staggering seven times for failing to pay nearly $10,000 in council rates and water bills - and she's STILL working off the debt despite earning $200,000 a year

Liberal senator Lucy Gichuhi failed to pay $8,359 in council rates in 2013, 2014
She had also failed to pay $1,372 worth of water rates to SA Water Corporation
Kenyan-born lawmaker who owns four houses was taken to court seven times

2018-06-27 07:54:26 UTC
"The plan of the NWO is to make everything of worth unrecognizable". Interesting way of looking at it...

Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose of Battle is to Destroy Marriage

(Source: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/lifematters/why-get-married/4058506 )

So it shouldn’t be hard to guess whose side of the fence Malcolm Turnbull is on.

Even knowing that there are radicals in all movements, doesn’t lessen the startling admission recently by lesbian journalist Masha Gessen. On a radio show she actually admits that homosexual activists are lying about their radical political agenda. She says that they don’t want to access the institution of marriage; they want to radically redefine and eventually eliminate it.

Here is what she recently said on a radio interview:

“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie.

The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago.

I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three… And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.”

For quite some time, the defenders of natural marriage have attempted to point out that the true agenda behind the homosexual demands organizations is not marriage equality; it is the total unraveling of marriage and uprooting traditional values from society. (This will ultimately include efforts to silence and punish some churches that openly adhere to their religious teachings about marriage and sexual morality.)

While few have been as vocal as this lesbian activist was in this interview, we do have numerical examples proving her point. When given the opportunity to marry, after laws have been struck down relatively small percentages of homosexuals actually bother to marry compared to their heterosexual counterparts. This raises question about the true need to unravel marriage for the “fair” extension its benefits. Only 12 percent of homosexuals in the Netherlands marry compared to 86 percent of their heterosexual peers. Less than 20 percent of same-sex couples already living together in California married when given the chance in 2008. In contrast, 91 percent of heterosexual couples in California who are living together are married.

Clearly this is about cultural change and tearing down the traditional family ethic, since it seems that most homosexuals living together neither need nor desire to marry, though they do desire to radically change marriage.

Gays and lesbians are free to live as they choose, and we live in a society which roundly applauds them doing so like never before in our history, but they do not have the right to rewrite marriage for all of society.

Source: http://illinoisfamily.org/homosexuality/homosexual-activist-admits-true-purpose-of-battle-is-to-destroy-marriage/#.UXAEZSnpqNU.facebook
2018-06-29 03:36:12 UTC
Started with the ALP Whitlam government...nice to have had its implications pointed out at the time. Very little from the Left on it.

Australia The Lima Declaration

2018-06-29 09:45:14 UTC
A must view article...

A top House Democrat lost his primary — to a socialist
2018-07-02 08:56:01 UTC
UK Immigration Judges Charged with £13 Million Legal Aid Fraud

2018-07-03 23:48:09 UTC
Some idea of the extent of foreign ownership of Australia, increasingly Asiatic...

Stop latest foreign takeover of gas and electricity infrastructure

Treasurer Scott Morrison is currently considering whether to allow Hong Kong based company Cheung Kong Infrastructure's (CKI) $13 billion bid to acquire APA. APA owns and operates the largest interconnected gas transmission network across Australia including 15,000 kilometres of gas pipeline and 13 of the nations 30 major gas pipelines.

The Treasurer blocked CKI along with State Grid Corporation of China (owned by the Chinese Communist Government) from an investment in NSW’s Ausgrid in 2016 but allowed CKI to acquire gas distribution business Envestra and DUET between 2014-17. The DUET approval gave CKI majority control of Victoria’s gas and electricity distribution network. Before the DUET takeover, CKI already owned much of the electricity and gas infrastructure spanning three states.

This was despite the Federal government establishing the Critical Infrastructure Centre in January 2017 to “develop coordinated, whole-of-government national security risk assessments and advice to support government decision-making on investment transactions” and the “Centre’s initial focus [to] be on the most critical assets in our electricity, water and ports sectors”. Then Attorney-General George Brandis and Treasurer Scott Morrison added, “with increased privatisation, supply chain arrangements being outsourced and offshored, and the shift in our international investment profile, Australia’s national critical infrastructure is more exposed than ever to sabotage, espionage and coercion”.

In terms of foreign ownership of critical infrastructure, the State Grid Corporation of China already effectively controls electricity distribution in north-western Melbourne and along with Singapore Power, effectively owns Victoria’s network of poles and wires, electricity distribution in eastern Victoria and gas distribution in western Melbourne and regional Victoria.

If the latest takeover bid is approved by the Treasurer, foreign company CKI would own the majority of the nation’s gas pipelines, along with gas storage facilities, gas distribution assets and power generation, transmission and distribution facilities.
2018-07-04 03:14:41 UTC
ME and Libyan interventions as examples of Proxy Wars...

Background only:
2018-07-06 10:14:19 UTC
National Pride????? 'France is The Only African Team Left In the World Cup'

France World Cup Players with their country of origin:-

1) Presnel Kimpembe - Congo

2) Samuel Umtiti - Cameroon

3) Paul Pogba - Guinea

4) Kylian Mbappé - Cameroon/Nigeria

5) Ousmane Dembélé - Senegal/Mali

6) Corentin Tolisso - Togo

7) N'Golo Kanté - Mali

8) Blaise Matuidi - DR Congo

9) Steven Nzonzi - DR Congo

10) Steve Mandanda - DR Congo

11) Adil Rami - Morocco

12) Nabil Fekir - Algeria

13) Djibril Sidibé - Senegal

14) Benjamin Mendy - Senegal
2018-08-06 11:26:35 UTC
Quote: "Argentina and other Third World countries have violated the prime rule of credit: never to denominate debt in another currency that you can’t print."


Argentina’s New $50 Billion IMF Loan Is Designed to Replay Its 2001 Crisis
Michael Hudson • July 23, 2018
2018-08-08 08:08:24 UTC
The background to srd's YES...but NO!!!!!


August 1, 2018

After all the wailing about the children streaming across our wide-open, wall-less border, there was very little media interest in the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday on this very subject. Knowing facts could interfere with their showboating displays of compassion.

Among the facts journalists might have learned is that, although the Constitution technically gives Congress the power to write laws, it turns out our immigration laws are written by the ACLU.

The children clamoring across our border can't be held for more than 20 days. This isn't because Congress, after hearings, debate and negotiation, passed a law. The 20-day rule was the ACLU's innovation.

The Alien Civil Liberties Union brought endless lawsuits, resulting in a 1997 "settlement agreement" between two parties who appeared to be opposed, but were actually on the same side: the pro-open borders Janet Reno Justice Department versus the pro-open borders ACLU. No, no -- not the briar patch, ACLU! Anything but that!

The 20-day limit is unfortunate because, from capture to final order, an immigration proceeding takes 30 to 40 days. Illegals who are detained at the border cost the taxpayers $1,600 to remove. By contrast, releasing illegals, even under the much-celebrated "alternatives to detention" (ankle monitors and "community supervision"), costs U.S. taxpayers $75,000 per removal -- and most of them don't ever get removed. By some estimates, 90 percent don’t even show up for their hearings.

The biggest spike in illegal border crossings came after Dolly Gee, an Obama-appointed federal district court judge in California, announced in 2015 that not only "children," but also any adults traveling with them, had to be released into our country after 20 days.

I wonder if Judge Gee's order created any sort of incentive. Drag some unfortunate child across thousands of miles of desert and ... YOU WIN! You're in and will most likely never be caught and deported. Arrive alone and you will be detained and probably removed after 30 days.

How insane was that ruling? It was too much even for the Ninth Circuit, which ruled that the free pass applies only to "the children." (Child defined as "anyone who claims to be under 18 years old.") Drug dealers, coyotes and scam artists would have to wait for Rachel Maddow to cry about SEPARATING FAMILIES! for their free passes.

If the kids can't be held for longer than 20 days and the parents can't be separated from their (alleged) children, then the only option is to release both adults and children into the U.S. As Matthew Albence, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official, said, Judge Gee effectively imposed "catch and release" on the entire country.

Members of Congress pass laws to stop child trafficking -- and then the ACLU comes in and creates a gigantic incentive to engage in child trafficking.

The parents are so broken up about being separated from "their" children that hundreds of them have gone home without them. Reams of articles hysterically claimed that the evil Trump administration tricked these super-involved parents into signing forms they couldn't understand!

-- "Migrant parents were misled into waiving rights to family reunification, ACLU tells court" -- The Washington Post, July 26 2018

-- "Immigrant Parents Unwittingly Signed Away Right to Reunite With Children, Lawyers Say" -- Huffington Post, 07/25/2018

-- "'Why Did You Leave Me?' The Migrant Children Left Behind as Parents Are Deported'" -- The New York Times, July 27, 2018

Nowhere will you read that the form the parents signed was written by the ACLU.

Liberals don't care about kids. They want to wreck our country.

More than 700,000 illegals who were caught sneaking into our country -- not the 40 million we didn't catch -- are now living here free. Really free: free health care, free housing, free food. Last year, with a force less than half the size of the New York City Police Department, ICE removed more than 100,000 illegal aliens with criminal convictions.

At $75,000 per removal and assuming 80 percent are ordered removed, it will cost taxpayers approximately $42 billion to remove the 700,000 illegals the ACLU made us release, forget the ones we never caught in the first place. That's just procedural costs -- not the costs in welfare, schooling, vaccinations, dental care, drunk driving accidents, MS-13 violence and the ongoing heroin epidemic.

How much would that wall cost, again?

2018-08-16 13:01:50 UTC
Was the Sea-Tac Baggage Handler’s Aerobatics Show a Giant Staged-Deception PsyOp?

A response...

"I was in your camp at first, Undecider. Your question are always the first to ask. In short: Who Benefits? - What possible benefits could accrue from a staged silly stunt like this; what could possibly motivate them to expend the very large resources to bring this off successfully (these false flags cannot be inexpensive).

But then it all made sense; Another Sept 11 anniversary coming up, I think there are factions of the deep state who very much want to remind people that an ordinary, untrained person can step behind the controls of a commercial airliner and perform amazing stunts with complete success - pick out a needle in the NY skyline say, or accomplish dangerous and extremely difficult maneuvers over Pugent Sound.

Very interesting to note that Drudge had "aviation experts" "shaking their heads" at that performance. "He had to have had training" says one.

And I vividly recall on or about Sept 13, 2001 - the well known NY Times columnist William Safire writing regarding the airplane that crashed into the Pentagon; something to the effect that the pilot absolutely had to have had specialized flight training (probably by some foreign intelligence org) - in order to be able to execute those maneuvers (the vertical corkscrew descent to the Pentagon). Mr Safire went on to urge our intelligence services to follow up on that.

And you know what happened? Mr Safire, never once mentioned that issue again in his column. He was a long time conservative "voice" at the NY Times (courtesy of Spiro Agnew) - his final columns appeared (I think) at the end of the year. Never once did he return to his claim. He died in 2009.

I return again and again to tnn's notion of a "cartoon world" - it strikes me as a very useful way of beginning to understand our predicament (if "understanding" is even possible at this point).

They have to re-reinforce the "cartoon world" every once in a while - this stunt was part of that effort - I really think it's that simple."
2018-08-17 10:08:56 UTC
There is another, more convincing analysis to STAS than this. I think it was the real thing.
2018-08-18 07:48:21 UTC
Early (1920’s) views widely held in the Australian Communist party and among its supporters in the Australian Labour Party on nations UNDER CAPITALISM…

“J. Curtin…was a leader of Labour, editor of the Westralian Worker. …He was a Westralian delegate to the 1921 (Socialisation)conference. It would be only a decade before he would become leader of the Federal Labour Party.
…He said (Official Report, p. 35):
"that if he understood it rightly, the Labour Movement did not stand for the multiplicity of nations. If the movers of the motion would favour the establishment of a Republic of the British Empire he would support them.
"Labour wanted to have less nations upon the face of the earth, not more. He wanted not to divide nations, but desired them to be one entity. They were going to achieve international Communism more easily by having one or two empires than by having a number of national entities. If they wanted to make the British Empire a working class republic he was with them. "If they wanted to divide it into a hundred political groups he was opposed to them. "He favoured the overthrow of British iniquities in Ireland, but he believed that the mere creation of a new flag—a capitalist flag, not a red flag—was not a step towards international communism, but a step toward the preservation of small and independent entities."”

DT: That meant support for bringing India, Britain, the African and Caribbean Colonies, Hong Kong, Singapore, Burma, Canada, Australia, New Zealand…into one national entity UNDER CAPITALISM, as it would facilitate the transition to Communism.
So the Utopian disease has been a part of the left ever since the Russian Revolution and perhaps before. Is it any wonder that it has been revived as farce by its present day products of decay?
2018-08-21 09:22:19 UTC
Missed this...but if the motive behind this wasn't just commercial - and likely it wasn't - then all credit to Zuckerberg - in a situation where things are fast closing in...

Zuckerberg in Holocaust denial row
19 July 2018

Mark Zuckerberg has once again found himself at the centre of a row, after saying posts from Holocaust deniers should be allowed on Facebook.

In an interview with technology website Recode, Mr Zuckerberg said that he did not believe such people should be removed from the site.

They were not, he said, "intentionally" getting their facts wrong.

The comments caused a backlash and Mr Zuckerberg later issued a clarification.

The original comments, given in a wide-ranging interview with Recode, were made in response to questions about what Facebook was doing to combat fake news and sites, such as InfoWars, that promoted conspiracy theories.

In Myanmar, also known as Burma, Facebook has been accused by UN investigators of facilitating violence against Rohingya Muslims by allowing anti-Muslim hate speech and fake news.

The social network has now said that it will begin removing misinformation that could lead to people being physically harmed.

When asked about its policy on fake news, Mr Zuckerberg offered, without prompting, the example of Holocaust deniers.

"I'm Jewish and there's a set of people who deny that the Holocaust happened," he told reporter Kara Swisher.

"I find it deeply offensive. But at the end of the day, I don't believe that our platform should take that down because I think there are things that different people get wrong. I don't think that they're intentionally getting it wrong.

"Everyone gets things wrong and if we were taking down people's accounts when they got a few things wrong, then that would be a hard world for giving people a voice and saying that you care about that."

The comments caused a storm of protest.

Editor of anti-fascist magazine Searchlight Gerry Gable told the BBC: "Zuckerberg could kill much of this dangerous material getting worldwide distribution - but he is a like a spoilt teenager."

"Because of his financial powers, he just does a bit of tinkering without understanding how this material could inspire crazy people to firebomb synagogues, mosques or churches."

NBC News reporter Benjy Sarlin tweeted asking whether Mr Zuckerberg thought the debate over whether the Holocaust had happened was in "good faith".
Image Copyright @BenjySarlin @BenjySarlin

And Matt Ford, a reporter at The Atlantic, pointed out that Mr Zuckerberg had not even been asked about the Holocaust - "he just said he'd keep it on Facebook on his own".

See full article with freeze frames of twitter etc posts here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-44883743
2018-08-21 10:17:04 UTC
Extreme ethnocentrism aside (and absolutely no support for Corbyn & his phony BLP), this straight talking to these shits is well put...

Norman Finkelstein to Dame Margaret Hodge: 'You haven't a clue what you're talking about'

and this...

Norman Finkelstein on the Labour Antisemitism 'Crisis': What Should Labour Do?

Of course Finkelstein wouldn't say anything on this if the BLP came out against any more immigration to the UK.
2018-08-21 10:35:45 UTC
Don't know of this Rosen chap, but he seems to hit the nail on the head as to motivations here...

Comes in with a similar approach to Finkelstein...

TMOATS (20.07.18) Prof Michael Rosen & George Galloway on Hodge, Corbyn and anti-semitism

2018-08-26 00:43:55 UTC
One often wonders what sort of a game is being played by Russia Today (RT)...

‘Migrants out, support for Hitler’: Outrage at group running for election in Sweden

These stinking little Pommy "journalists" always feature in these types of videos in which the enemy is the big event - the big gains expected by the anti-Globalists in the upcoming Swedish election (Sunday 9 September 2018)- and marginalising them by focusing on a fringe.

It's as if the Russian government supports the bringing down of Europe so their relative position is strengthened. And in that there's always plenty of compliant scum to do their bidding. They've got historic form in the lying department...take the Katyn Woods massacre where they eliminated a large proportion of the Polish elite and...for nearly SIXTY YEARS blamed it on the "Nazis"...a lie (often still) propped up by the compliant Utopian Western Left apologists who, in practice, threw their weight in behind the Anglo-American side in WWII almost to a man, thereby repeating the Stalinist lie that it wasn't an INTER-Imperialist War.

The Comments provide a sufficient answer.
2018-08-28 07:09:10 UTC
Make of this assertion what you will...

“As the rise of Donald Trump and other populists has shown, control over traditional media is no longer enough to guarantee control over politics.”

The traditional media’s eclipse suggests no more than a change in the ruling faction. Out, Diaspora globalists, in, Likudniks (and media Breitbart, Rebel, etc.). The new populists, are to a man, strongly pro-Israel and anti-Islam, and their popularity is aligned with the Likud’s project of militarily reshaping the Middle East.


2018-08-28 12:07:55 UTC
Take a look at this garbage...note the commentary and the youtubed video...


Never lifted a finger to save their nations...quite the contrary. Pure filth.
2018-08-29 01:11:36 UTC
Something like this is what Greece, Italy, Spain...and Europe in general needs...an international solution at the borders of those nations that are first ports of call for the fake refugees...

Of course it's all conditional on having the political will to do it...

It's problematic whether this can be done in a stable way by means of the "Democratic" process...

They have to go back: Hungary’s Orban calls for deporting illegal migrants to Africa
28 Aug, 2018
They have to go back: Hungary’s Orban calls for deporting illegal migrants to Africa
© Massimo Pinca / Reuters


Orban was speaking during a press conference following a meeting with Italian Interior Minister Matteo Salvini, who has come under fire in recent days for refusing to allow more than 100 African migrants to disembark from a boat docked in Catania.
Read more

Asked whether migrants should be relocated from Italy to other EU countries, Orban said that they should be sent back home.

“We should send them back instead of relocating them,” he said, adding that anything else would mean “the human smugglers have won” and “immigrants would keep coming in further waves”.

Orban said that illegal migration was the most important issue facing the European Union and said that Hungary was “attacked” by Brussels because the country had shown that it was possible that migrants could be stopped on land, referring to the fence built at Hungary’s border with Serbia and Croatia.

It was possible, Orban said, for Salvini to prove that migrants could “also be stopped at sea.” He called on Salvini not to “retreat” and promised assistance from Hungary to help Italy protect its borders. “Europe’s security hinges on his [Salvini’s] success,” he said.
Read on at: https://www.rt.com/news/437085-orban-salvini-deportation-migrants/
2018-09-11 10:04:16 UTC
The Duran: Trump does a 180 on Syria. War is on the horizon

And article:

Trump Does 180 Shift On Syria: Regime Change Back On The Table

Only months ago the president expressed a desire "to get out" and pull the over 2,000 publicly acknowledged American military personnel from the country.

Read on at: http://www.renegadetribune.com/trump-does-180-shift-on-syria-regime-change-back-on-the-table/
2018-09-15 00:43:47 UTC
When is The God Emperor going to break up the Tech Oligarchs?
12 Sept 2018

Leaked video shows Google leadership's political bias and conspiracy...

See key points of video in replies.

In this leaked video from 2016, we can see Google leadership's dismay over the results of the US election and hear their discussing their conspiracy to provide "in-kind" political efforts to one party to attempt to sway the outcome

As an aside, here is a response to the video from Styxhexxenhammer who breaks down the dangers shown in this video.

Thanks to user Floyd Maxwell for timestamps

Key moments from the video can be found at the following timestamps:

(00:00:00 – 00:01:12) Google co-founder Sergey Brin states that the weekly meeting is “probably not the most joyous we’ve had” and that “most people here are pretty upset and pretty sad.”

(00:00:24) Brin contrasts the disappointment of Trump’s election with his excitement at the legalization of cannabis in California, triggering laughs and applause from the audience of Google employees.

(00:01:12) Returning to seriousness, Brin says he is “deeply offen[ded]” by the election of Trump, and that the election “conflicts with many of [Google’s] values.”

(00:09:10) Trying to explain the motivations of Trump supporters, Senior VP for Global Affairs, Kent Walker concludes: “fear, not just in the United States, but around the world is fueling concerns, xenophobia, hatred, and a desire for answers that may or may not be there.”

(00:09:35) Walker goes on to describe the Trump phenomenon as a sign of “tribalism that’s self-destructive [in] the long-term.”

(00:09:55) Striking an optimistic tone, Walker assures Google employees that despite the election, “history is on our side” and that the “moral arc of history bends towards progress.”

(00:10:45) Walker approvingly quotes former Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi’s comparison between “the world of the wall” with its “isolation and defensiveness” and the “world of the square, the piazza, the marketplace, where people come together into a community and enrich each other’s lives.”

(00:15:20) Porat promises that Google will “use the great strength and resources and reach we have to continue to advance really important values.”

(00:20:24) Eileen Naughton, VP of People Operations, promises that Google’s policy team in DC is “all over” the immigration issue and that the company will “keep a close watch on it.”

(00:21:26) Naughton jokes about Google employees asking, ‘Can I move to Canada?’ after the election. She goes on to seriously discuss the options available to Google employees who wish to leave the country.

(00:23:12) Naughton does acknowledge “diversity of opinion and political persuasion” and notes that she has heard from conservative Google employees who say they “haven’t felt entirely comfortable revealing who [they] are.” and urged “tolerance.” (Several months later, the company would fire James Damore allegedly for disagreeing with progressive narratives.)

(00:27:00) Responding to a question about “filter bubbles,” Sundar Pichai promises to work towards “correcting” Google’s role in them

(00:27:30) Sergey Brin praises an audience member’s suggestion of increasing matched Google employee donations to progressive groups.

(00:34:40) Brin compares Trump voters to “extremists,” arguing for a correlation between the economic background of Trump supporters and the kinds of voters who back extremist movements. Brin says that “voting is not a rational act” and that not all of Trump’s support can be attributed to “income disparity.” He suggests that Trump voters might have been motivated by boredom rather than legitimate concerns.

(00:54:33) An employee asks what Google is going to do about “misinformation” and “fake news” shared by “low-information voters.” Pichai responds by stating that “investments in machine learning and AI” are a “big opportunity” to fix the problem.

(00:56:12) Responding to an audience member, Walker says Google must ensure the rise of populism doesn’t turn into “a world war or something catastrophic … and instead is a blip, a hiccup.”

(00:58:22) Brin compares Trump voters to supporters of fascism and communism, linking the former movement to “boredom,” which Brin previously linked to Trump voters. “It sort of sneaks up sometimes, really bad things” says Brin.

(01:01:57) An audience member asks if the executives see “anything positive from this election result.” The audience of Google employees, and the executives on stage, burst into laughter. “Boy, that’s a really tough one right now” says Brin.
2018-09-21 23:23:55 UTC
Interesting preliminary analysis of Clinton-Yeltsin papers...including on the - effective - Russian military - neutering - of Yeltsin...

Clinton-Yeltsin docs shine a light on why Deep State hates Putin

The Duran – News in Review – Episode 114. The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss the nearly 600 pages of transcripts documenting the calls and personal conversations between then U.S. President Bill Clinton and Russian President Boris Yeltsin, released last month. A strong Clinton and a very weak Yeltsin underscore a warm and friendly relationship between the U.S. and Russia. Then Vladimir Putin came along and decided to lift Russia out of the abyss, and things changed.
2019-02-04 09:24:33 UTC
Poland and the Lies of the Allies

Poland and the Lies of the Allies
February 3, 2019 renegade 2 Comments
By Eric Thomson with research by Paul Norris (2000)

Poland and its hapless people had largely served their purpose by becoming the excuse for Britain and its reluctant French ally to declare war on Germany in 1939. As historian David Irving points out, Britain’s touted war aim was initially the “defense of Polish sovereignty.” Of course, it had been agreed upon before 1939 that Britain and France would not intervene if the Soviet Union were to violate Polish sovereignty, as happened a few weeks after the German preemptive strike against Poland. But, unlike the Moor of Shakespeare, the Poles did not go away. Even after the kosher slaughter of some 15,000 members of the Polish officer corps, the Poles and their national interests remained. In fact, it was this Soviet massacre of the Poles at Katyn which served to emphasize to the Poles their likely fate under Soviet/Khazar rule. Therein lay the seeds of a Polish-German alliance. In 1943, the government of Britain was indeed worried by indications that the Poles might wish to put Polish interests ahead of world banksterdom.

On August 10,1943, W.D. Allen of the Central Department of the British Foreign Office writes plaintively to the Political Intelligence Department chief in the Foreign Office:

Consequent upon our conversation this morning, I attach a paper which was primarily intended as an aide-memoir within our section and which, therefore, may contain some rather obvious statements. Nevertheless, it is a very accurate picture of the grounds for suspicion which I mentioned to you this morning… May I urge most strongly the necessity for not hinting to any Polish contacts your suspicions on this matter… because if they felt that there was any leakage of information through us as to their own fears and suspicions, it would close the door to any future negotiations between us and them.”

The accompanying memorandum is marked “Most Secret” and is entitled “POLISH GERMAN COLLABORATION.” It begins thusly:

The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to the situation which now exists in Poland and to the danger that the Germans may succeed in setting up a collaborationist regime in the General Government. At no time since the occupation has such an eventuality been considered possible until now, but recent deterioration in the situation makes it seem that this possibility should be taken into serious consideration… Background: (1) Resentment against Soviet Russia has for long been intense and practically universal among the Poles in Poland. As the German military power seems to be waning, the possibility of collaboration is likely to be greater and no less if the fear of Russian (sic)occupation increases. (2) German anti-Soviet propaganda has been and is in accordance with the sentiments of the great majority of the Polish people to whom it is directed. (3) It is believed, both by the general population and by the responsible leaders that Soviet and communist subversive propaganda and activity in Poland is intended to disrupt the country so that it will be unable, after the defeat of Germany, to offer effective resistance to Soviet domination…”

Evidence of the Present Critical Situation: (1) Since the affair (sic) of Katyn the Germans have for the first time obtained the collaboration of responsible Polish journalists in their press campaign against Soviet Russia. Delegations from several responsible Polish bodies visited Katyn under German auspices. (2) The clandestine press of Poland is concentrating more and more upon bitter attacks against Soviet Russia and against the subversive activities within Poland which are being encouraged by Soviet Russia. (3) The tone of our responsible contacts in the Polish Ministry of the Interior has changed noticeably in the past few weeks… They are obviously nervous at the inevitable effects of the recent German anti-Soviet campaign upon a population ‘without proper political orientations’ (sic). It seems clear that while they are confident in the attitude of the resistance organizations, they are now becoming alarmed at the possibility that these organizations may lose something of their support from the people and that individuals may be found whose fear and hatred of Russia is sufficiently strong to induce them to collaborate formally with the Germans, at any rate to the extent of opposing Russia (sic). (4) Since the affair of Katyn, Russian (sic) accusations of collaboration among Poles in the General Government, although malicious, have been specific and give the impression that there is some degree of fact behind the exaggeration. (5) Frank [the German Governor General of Occupied Poland] has recently declared that he hopes to make the General Government a model satellite state. This reads like propaganda intended to anticipate the probable course of events. (6) The Krakauer Zeitung of 24th July reports a meeting between Governor General Frank and the President and Director of the Polish General Welfare Council ‘to discuss the general situation of the Polish population, with special reference to the events in the Lublin district.’ (7) A P.W.I. report from Stockholm ingenuously states that the ‘Germans are starting to set up a Polish Quisling government. This plan results from a successful propaganda on the Katyn mass graves.’ In view of the above, it does seem that there is a strong possibility of some kind of Quisling Government being set up in Poland supported by (a) Warsaw degenerates; (b) genuinely patriotic Poles who passionately fear the Russian (sic) menace more than anything else in the world.”

The trick was to keep Poland strong enough and determined enough to fight the Germans, but not to fight the Soviets. So far, the Polish Secret Army had served British-Soviet interests well via guerrilla warfare, sabotage and espionage against the German war effort in Poland. It is even mentioned in one Polish Secret Army report that agents were helping to spread the deadly typhus disease. Polish military units serving with the British and so-called Free French forces had to be placated as well so that their fear and loathing for the Soviets could be put ‘safely’ in the background.

Read on at: http://www.renegadetribune.com/poland-and-the-lies-of-the-allies/
2019-02-04 21:44:45 UTC
Things you should know about gun control in Australia...

Young American woman living in Australia...


Let's talk about American gun violence statistics...

2019-02-14 08:01:28 UTC
Netanyanu Tweets Then Quickly Deletes He Is Seeking "War With Iran"
by Tyler Durden
Wed, 02/13/2019 - 16:25

During the middle of the day Wednesday the official verified twitter account for the Prime Minister of Israel stated that PM Benjamin Netanyahu was in Warsaw attending the US-led Middle East summit with an aim to "advance the common interest of war with Iran."
Read on at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-13/netanyahu-tweets-hes-seeking-war-iran-while-warsaw-summit
2019-02-15 10:41:39 UTC
Ron Paul makes sense on Civil War...

Ron Paul talks about the Confederacy, Secession, Income tax, R E Lee, The draft, States vs Fed.

2019-02-17 23:14:32 UTC
RAW: Albanian opposition attempts to storm PM's residence

2019-02-19 06:19:38 UTC
I have never been more aware of the fact that this "Climate Change" fraud is the MAIN underpinning of all Globalist economic/revenue policy...


Climate Change Religion And Related Cover-Ups: What The Hell Is NASA Hiding?
by Tyler Durden
Fri, 02/15/2019 - 19:50
Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk,

The shrill voices of climate change hucksters get louder every day. Supposedly the world will end in 12 years. It won't.

Someone asked me on Twitter today "who are you to debate climate scientists."

Well, who are priests and clergy to debate Darwinism? Should we prevent debate that does not suit us?

Here's a widely held view: Climate Change Denial Should Be a Crime

In 1663, leading scientists all thought the sun revolved around the earth. The Catholic Church Convicted Galileo of Heresy for disputing the claim.

Supposedly, we are brighter today.

But why do we have scientists faking data and suppressing data that does not meet the cause?

The Climate Scandal of the Decade involves fundamentally flawed methods and data manipulation to produce a "hockey stick" rise in temperatures.

When the statistical methods used to create the "hockey stick" were first exposed as fundamentally flawed by an expert Canadian statistician Steve McIntyre , an increasingly heated battle has been raging between Mann's supporters, calling themselves "the Hockey Team", and McIntyre and his own allies, as they have ever more devastatingly called into question the entire statistical basis on which the IPCC and CRU construct their case.

There are three threads in particular in the leaked documents which have sent a shock wave through informed observers across the world. Perhaps the most obvious, as lucidly put together by Willis Eschenbach (see McIntyre's blog Climate Audit and Anthony Watt's blog Watts Up With That ), is the highly disturbing series of emails which show how Dr Jones and his colleagues have for years been discussing the devious tactics whereby they could avoid releasing their data to outsiders under freedom of information laws.

They have come up with every possible excuse for concealing the background data on which their findings and temperature records were based.

This in itself has become a major scandal, not least Dr Jones's refusal to release the basic data from which the CRU derives its hugely influential temperature record, which culminated last summer in his startling claim that much of the data from all over the world had simply got "lost". Most incriminating of all are the emails in which scientists are advised to delete large chunks of data, which, when this is done after receipt of a freedom of information request, is a criminal offence.

But the question which inevitably arises from this systematic refusal to release their data is – what is it that these scientists seem so anxious to hide?

What the Hell Is NASA Hiding?

Forgive me for asking, but What the Hell Is NASA Hiding?

If you click on that link it will display this message.

The article has been suppressed since 2010.

I commend an unknown person who made the following screen shot. I saw it in a Tweet, captured the image, but failed to record the person who snapped the image or the Tweet itself.
Blocked Article

The above image is difficult to read as presented, but I enlarged the image many times to make the transcript below.

The words are all legible. Here is a partial transcript starting with the opening paragraph, with all pertinent views from both sides captured fully. Emphasis is mine.

The Sun is the primary forcing of the Earth's climate system. ... In short, the Sun drives almost every aspect of our world's climate system and makes possible life as we know it.

Earth's orbit around and orientation toward the Sun change over spans of many thousands of years. In turn, these changing "orbital mechanics" force climate to change because they change where and how much sunlight reaches Earth. (Please see for more details). [Mish Comment: Unfortunately we can't.]

Thus, changing Earth's exposure forces climate to change. According to scientists' models of Earth's orbit and orientation towards the sun indicate that our world should just be beginning to enter a new period of cooling - perhaps the next ice age.

Human Impact

The text does discuss humans.

After the industrial revolution, humans introduced increasing amounts of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere, and changed the surface of the landscape to an extent great enough to influence climate on a local and global level.

I can accept that. I can also accept that temperatures are rising, while disputing the amount for many reasons.
NASA Conclusion

Scientists are using NASA satellites to monitor all of the aforementioned forcings of Earth's climate system to better understand how they are changing over time, and how any changes in them affect climate.

Left Unsaid

Any data that does not agree with climate foregone conclusions, will be wiped away. I just offered strong evidence.

What else has NASA suppressed?

Why do we need to suppress well-written articles when many scientists have doubts?

Humans breathe oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide.

Perhaps we have a solution that no one will endorse.

At the very minimum, why aren't any of the global warming advocates promoting distribution of free birth control pills?
Earth's Magnetic Field Flip Could Happen Sooner Than Expected

Scientific American reports the Earth's Magnetic Field Flip Could Happen Sooner Than Expected.

Changes measured by the Swarm satellite show that our magnetic field is weakening 10 times faster than originally predicted, especially over the Western Hemisphere

Scientists do not know why. What else don't they know? What do they think they know, that's false?
2019-02-21 01:04:22 UTC
"Robbing from the culturally rich and giving to the culturally poor"...

The Erasure of Whites from British History

2019-03-02 03:42:02 UTC
There's far worse people than this joker...

Rally To Save Our NHS: Dr John Lister

Totally defensible political positions, opposing Privatisation and Hedge Fund takeovers of the Health Service.

Presume he's the John Lister who went with Thornett in the mid-seventies split from the "WRP".

True Vn?
2019-03-12 01:53:33 UTC
Rounded, sober, analysis...

Financial Collapse - Brexit Project Fear Is Nothing More Than An Elaborate Hoax!

2019-03-13 23:47:51 UTC

U.S. Urban dictionary FIND...
Boca Cocktail
A glass of ice water with a wedge of lemon. Often ordered with extra lemon, which is used to make lemonade because the patron doesn't want to pay the $2.79. Common among the elderly Jews of Boca Raton, Florida.

"How's the check for your 8 top looking?"
"Pretty crappy, they're older than the Golden Girls and they all ordered Boca cocktails all around."
2019-03-16 11:18:28 UTC
Just by way of balance:

The Irish Savant

Wednesday, 13 March 2019
Finally - the end of the Achievement Gap
Reader Cognitive Dissionance has sent me this link from the Brookings Institute which asks the perennial question 'have we succeeded in bridging the achievement gap between blacks and Whites?' for 2018. Short answer: No. Same as it is every year. So I got down to work and after weeks of feverish research and brainstorming I believe we can solve the problem with the following Four-Point Plan.

Point 1: We know, because everyone tells us, that if blacks and Whites mix freely they’ll get on like a house on fire (maybe not the best analogy, but anyway). However, we also know, again because everyone tells us, that Whites – due to their racism – do everything in their power to avoid mixing with blacks. So here’s my solution. Why not transfer black kids (you can't start early enough!) to White schools and Whites to black schools, to the point that every school's racial breakdown reflect the real America? We could call this ‘Proactive Translocational Integration’, although that's a bit of a mouthful. What about ‘Coaching’, or better again Bussing?

Point 2: We know that blacks suffer low self-esteem. This derives of course from the legacy of slavery and generations of contempt from Whites. So why not build their self-esteem by denigrating everything about whiteness and pumping up everything about blackness? For example we could have something like, I dunno, Black History Hour every year, wherein black accomplishments in science, engineering and culture can be celebrated. Now I had thought about Black History Day, and even Black History Week, but, despite my best efforts was unable to find enough material. In fact, if truth be known, I found it hard to find enough to celebrate in for even one hour.

But there’s a way around that too – and all in a good cause, you understand. What I have in mind here is to gently finess the actual story. So for example Rastus worked in the lab that developed the atom bomb, sweeping the floor and bringing in the coffee. We needn’t refer to this, just claim that he ‘was part of the team at Los Alamos’. The opportunities are endless, well, maybe enough for a full Black History Day. And, just to be sure, we could make it a criminal offence for anyone (any white person) to take the piss out of such achievements.

Point 3. Now as we’re constantly reminded, blacks are always portrayed unfavourably in the media. I mean, when do you ever see a black character in a Hollywood movie, and in the odd time you do aren’t they always shown as dumb, violent, thieving welfare bums? Of course. I suggest that they be portrayed as doctors and scientists, and generally wise, honest and noble. Do you ever see a black in an advertisement? Ok, they’re only 13% of the US population, but you’d imagine that just once in a while the privileged Whites would nod in their direction and make a token inclusion? So that's my third point, try to give blacks some favourable coverage in the MSM, and, on the odd occasion that they do step out of line, don't highlight the race of the perpetrator as is always done now.

Point 4. And now to my fourth and final and most important breakthrough idea. To compensate for the legacy of slavery, give blacks preferential treatment when it comes to gaining entry to prestige colleges and promotions at work. Even if they’re almost totally unqualified, give them the jobs! By definition, this must end all the inequality! I suggest that this initiative be called Positive Discrimination……. or Affirmative Action, or some such thing. Now I know this might result in planes falling out of the sky and bridges collapsing. But I unhesitatingly say that such would be a small price for ending the achievement gap.

Now I realise that some of these suggestions are a little bit crazy. After all, why would Whites willingly allow themselves to be queue-jumped at every phase of economic and educational activity, see their better qualified children passed over due to the colour of their skin, their race denigrated at every turn, the taxes going to compensate for what they’d see as black social incontinence?

I admit it, it’s a big ask. And achieving it would require a degree of social and mind control beyond the imagination of even a Stalin or a Pol Pot. Naw, forget it. White Americans would never go along with it.

2019-04-09 13:14:52 UTC
The Evil at the heart of the Irish Establishment | John Bowler at Irexit Kerry

2019-04-09 13:28:05 UTC
Post by t***@yahoo.com.au
The Evil at the heart of the Irish Establishment | John Bowler at Irexit Kerry
See the above one too.

The Government is Misleading Us on the Border with Northern Ireland | Ray Bassett at Irexit Cork

Anthony Coughlan at Irexit Galway | Supranationalism and Creeping EU Federalism

Irexit Freedom Youtube site:
2019-04-13 09:52:55 UTC
Mr. Assange’s Digital McCarthyism
Jim Goad

Upon superficial inspection, still-living superstar hacker Julian Assange and long-dead commie-stalker Joseph McCarthy seem like natural-born enemies and political polar opposites. Technically, the Arctic and Antarctica are polar opposites, too, but are they really that different?

Comparing anyone to infamous anti-communist zealot Joseph McCarthy, as he is popularly understood in pop culture, is to accuse them of being a torch-carrying megalomaniac with a sociopathic disregard for the damage wrought by their ruthless, Spanish Inquisition-style paranoid purges, persecutions, pogroms, and perennial pickin’ on people. “McCarthyism” is considered a smear because we all must admit it was a shameful moment in American history when some upstart cheesehead Senator dared to suggest the American government was being infiltrated with communist sympathizers. Blot from your minds forever the fact that certain Soviet “cables” decrypted after McCarthy’s death seem to have at least partially vindicated him, and let us never teach in our public schools that communist governments murdered at least a hundred million human beings.

WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange has made it clear he in no way identifies with the alcoholic, hound-jowled, Red-hunting Wisconsin Senator from the 1950s. Last December after Bank of America, MasterCard, and Visa ceased all transactions with WikiLeaks, Assange denounced it as “business McCarthyism.”

Last week, possibly as partial payback, the silver-haired, ferret-faced Assange held a press conference with Swiss ex-banker Rudolf Elmer wherein Elmer publicly handed Assange two CDs allegedly containing confidential banking information on over two thousand super-wealthy international tax cheats. After data-bombing the US military-industrial complex last year, Assange has vowed that he’s now aiming for America’s corporate culture and banking system.

Although WikiLeaks gained most of its notoriety by releasing confidential US government documents, this isn’t the first time Assange has targeted private individuals. Whereas McCarthy’s enemy remained constant, Assange has pursued an array of targets. His specific crusade may change with the seasons, but the crusading doesn’t. Last year he pissed a steamy yellow data stream in the face of “the government.” This year he’s sharpening his lance, mounting his snowy-white horse, and galloping into battle against “the rich.”

And a few years ago, he employed distinctly McCarthyite tactics against “the racists.”

The story never got much play in America because it didn’t involve Americans, but in 2008 Assange authorized the release of a private document purportedly containing the names, home addresses, and in many cases the telephone numbers and email addresses of over 10,000 members of the nativist, anti-immigration British National Party. WikiLeaks released the information in violation of a court injunction. Ironically, as Assange remains in England under house arrest for cellophane-flimsy Swedish sex-crime charges, the British may have a more solid criminal case against him for violating that injunction than the Swedes do for when he fucked those two different chicks and then both girls found out about it.

Even though we’re subliminally and overtly trained to deny it, my twisted pink speckled Irish guts tell me that today’s “racists” play almost the identical social role of a scapegoated, stigmatized, ostracized, universally maligned, and dehumanized ideological outgroup that people accused of being “communists” played in the 1950s.

Assange’s stepfather is quoted on Wikipedia as saying, “He always stood up for the underdog…he was always very angry about people ganging up on other people.” But I can’t picture Assange getting very peeved at what seems like all of England ganging up on BNP leader Nick Griffin on national TV. I can’t picture his nostrils fuming at the sight of his fellow info-pirates gloating about how the leaked membership list will allow people to hunt down these bloody bigots and smash their windows. I don’t envision him getting apopleptic over the fact that several Brits claim to have lost their jobs after the list was published. . . . read the rest of this article here: http://takimag.com/article/mr_assanges_digital_mccarthyism
Published: February 20, 2011 | This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged articles, British National Party, Jim Goad, Julian Assange, North American New Right, reprints, Wikileaks. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
« A Serious Man
How Feminism Negates Folkways »
One Comment

Posted February 20, 2011 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

Assange has a strange background, unlike McCarthy. In fact, I suspect that Assange was a cult member (unwitting as a child, of course) of a CIA project in Australia. The Jew Henry Makow calls it a “Nazi cult,” but it was not Nazi (i.e. German) at all: it was some bizarre ‘Aryan’ cult run by an Anglo-Saxon woman. Just ignore the anti-Nazi tripe and focus on the oddness of his background. These superstars do not simply fall out of the sky; rather, they are raised and groomed to do what they do (MK Ultra, Project Monarch, Sex Kitten Programming, etc.). Have a look.


I personally want to know more about the role this covert CIA stuff plays in structuring our thinking. Here’s a related video (numerous parts):


2019-04-16 05:29:14 UTC
They waited for the death of this generation to step up the subversion...

The quickest way to get into a fight in a 1960s Australian pub | RetroFocus

The only one out of place is the intrusive but affable (((Canadian))).

Note the joker who didn't know the meaning of the word "bar" because they were ALL pubs in those days..the fuckwitted (((Canadian))) didn't get it.

LMFAO for the joy of the memory.
2019-04-25 09:49:07 UTC
Laying it bare...


Of course!
2019-04-29 02:15:32 UTC
The gratitude of the "British" for leading the struggle of the Greek people against the German occupation...

Street Fighting In Athens (1945)

The same thing writ large for the rest of the Allied nations today with the NWO takeover. Yes, but "'we' won the War".
2019-04-29 23:11:30 UTC
How good is this negotiation...like a gangster movie...without the physical violence...

Old NYC Union Guys Know How To Argue

Note the implicit respect for labor, despite all the BS.

This is a great channel showing the inside of US life as it once was.
2019-05-08 09:10:51 UTC
Administrative agencies of the American Federal Government since the passage of the 14th Amendment, have excluded foreigners and their children by race, creed, and color—including the total abolition of Chinese (The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882) and Japanese (Asian Exclusion Act of 1924) from becoming United States citizens. These examples bring great skepticism to the current debate raging in America, as today, we find the opposite interpretations of these same Amendments and Supreme Court decisions from the 1860s and 1880s, respectively, to mean that open borders are a human right for anyone, from anywhere, with any agenda--even ideologies hostile or dangerous to America and its principles.
Open Border advocates claim if a person can cross the U.S. border—legally or illegally--and drop their spawn, they add that child to the American taxpayer’s burden forever. No questions allowed by Progressive fanatics of the Administrative State or Mainstream Media—both of which once held the opposing view.
In fact, the same political party which decried this “Birthright Citizenship” as ‘an outrage’ as recently as 1990s (Democrat Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid) when it was not working in their party's favor, now holds “Birthright Citizenship” to be a sacrosanct human right. Immigrants coming then were largely seeking opportunity not a handout—and therefore more likely to vote Republican—but the incredibly generous giveaways of today attract a very different group of immigrants—more likely to be Democrats—thus the change in that party’s stance on the issue.

This madness prompted me to study the issue in depth and try to figure out how such an inane policy could possibly exist. It is admittedly an emotional, politically-driven debate, whose players keep switching sides, depending on the politics of the moment—and all of their interpretations appear to be wrong.

The facts reveal a more sensible truth.
FACT—It is true that the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted the right for those born in the United States to become citizens, as a means of forcing the instatement of citizenship for black Americans born on American soil who were victims of enslavement. This amendment actually fulfilled the Founders’ promise of equal treatment under law for Americans.
FACT— That same Amendment excluded Native Americans and women indicating considerable limitations were intended. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently acknowledged this uncomfortable truth in an interview—during which she forgot what the Fourteenth Amendment was about but was reminded. A member of the audience gave her a copy of the Constitution she swore to uphold—but apparently, rarely uses.

FACT—Just two months before the adoption of the 14th Amendment in 1866, Congress also passed the Civil Rights Act to address the same issues and declared “all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign powers, excluding Indians not taxed” to be citizens. If Congress did not intend for the original owners of America’s vast landscape to be citizens, granting that to all others, seems a bit of a stretch. Further, the phrase ‘subject to foreign powers’ clearly excludes any who come to the United States illegally as they are still subject to the jurisdiction of the nations from which they came or were born.

The hard hike uphill to the truth gets even trickier, as the last seminal decision on this issue harkens back to Supreme Court decision Wong Kim Ark from 1898, when the court ruled that since Wong Kim Ark was born to parents who were in America legally at his time of birth, he was, in fact, a U.S. citizen, even though the laws later passed by Congress denying his entire race citizenship, were in force upon his return to the United States from China.

The “Kim” ruling of 1898 decided that:
‘Upholding the concept of jus soli (citizenship based on place of birth),[116] the Court held that the Citizenship Clause needed to be interpreted in light of English common law,[117] which had included as subjects virtually all native-born children, excluding only those who were born to foreign rulers or diplomats, born on foreign public ships, or born to enemy forces engaged in hostile occupation of the country's territory.’[118][119][120] The ruling further required birth citizens to have “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States.”
Even the most elastic interpretation of this ruling would indicate that people illegally invading America to occupy even a square meter of the country’s territory would qualify for exclusion from ever holding legal status or their children having any birthright to citizenship. The further requirement to have “residence”and a "domicile" in the United States—meaning that the parents must hold lawful status to reside in the nation and have a place to live when birthing children—is inescapable. Simply sneaking across the border or setting one foot on U.S. soil to make their offspring a citizen does not qualify. This should end the question for all times—but that is not likely, as immigration is the only life raft keeping the ‘Progressive’ Democrat Party afloat in America today.
President Trump, given the seriousness of this issue and the ineptness of Congress to act on it, has promised an executive action—which will be immediately challenged by his opposition in the life raft (and the mainstream media that does most of its paddling). The President therefore needs to prepare for the inevitable court battle to prevent any of the invading ‘caravans’ from ever becoming residents or citizens by focusing on their stated intent to wilfully violate U.S. borders. That should determine them to be “enemy forces engaged in hostile occupation of the country’s territory.”
This 7,000 strong force of mostly young men between the ages of 18 and 24 have already broken through/invaded/violated the borders of either one or two nations, depending on whether they are Honduran or Guatemalan—and how Bangladeshis and Syrians came to be among them is yet to be determined—but they are, indeed, in the so-called ‘caravan’ as well.
Violently breaking through international borders, tearing down barricades and openly and notoriously violating the laws of Nations, while admittedly on the way to do so in yet a third or fourth nation to literally steal benefits, qualifies as ‘hostile’ and when financed by America’s enemies, it is rightly described as a ‘force’ with ill intent.
It was also revealed this week that molotov cocktails (gasoline bombs) are being produced to be used at Mexico’s Southern border by the next group of invaders to force entry, and weapons are being gathered just south of our own border by forces hostile to America, for a confrontation at the destination border—ours.

The funding for this 7,000 strong force, therefore, is quite relevant to the President’s argument as well, which is perhaps why no Progressive media has questioned how 7,000 people are fed, watered, toileted, and feted each day, to survive a 2,500 mile march. Now we know.
The money is coming from two Marxist dictators ‘hostile’ to the United States. The President of Honduras officially advised U.S. Vice-President, Mike Pence this week that his government can prove funding is coming from the Marxist regimes of Nicolás Maduro (Venezuela) and Miguel Díaz-Canel (Cuba) to finance this mercenary force marching on the United States.
This is actually a brilliant move in my opinion, though I abhor the use of poor people as pawns in a dangerous game of global politics by foreign dictators. For the cost of less than one bunker-busting bomb, however, these two dictators will cost the American taxpayers 1) hatred from the world community, and 2) they will impose a financial burden on the American taxpayers for a century.
This is brilliant. They are undermining their enemy for a pittance. If their cause was for actual freedom rather than Marxist oppression, I’d be their greatest advocate—but they are not for that. They are simply using poor, oppressed people to further their Marxist ideology and bankrupt America—and their comrades on America’s Left appear to be in goose-step with them.
In the President's argument should also be mention of the cost. Hispanic columnist, Sara Gonzales, recently reported on the pricetag of illegal immigration alone—which does not include those who enter the United States legally. The numbers are staggering:

“The Federation for American Immigration Reform — or FAIR — released a comprehensive report Wednesday on the rising cost of illegal immigration. Here are the numbers you should know:
Total government expenditures on illegal immigration: $134.9 billion per year
Total federal costs: $45.9 billion
● Education costs: $1.7 billion
● Medical costs: $17.1 billion
● Justice system costs: $13.1 billion
● Welfare programs: $5.9 billion
● General expenditures: $8.1 billion
Total state and local costs: $89 billion
● Education costs: $44.4 billion
● Medical costs: $12.2 billion
● Justice system costs: $10.9 billion
● Welfare costs: $2.9 billion
● General expenditures: $18.6
Though many immigration advocates believe these expenditures are offset by the taxes paid into the system by illegal immigrants, FAIR’s report shows that even when considering total taxes paid by illegal immigrants at both federal and local levels, the deficit is staggering, with the costs outweighing the taxes paid into the system by a 7-to-1 ratio.”
If someone successfully breaks into my home, that does not automatically make them a part of my family. If someone successfully breaks into my nation, that does not make them—or their child—my fellow citizen, and we should not have to spend this money to support them.
Both are criminals—for whom I have great sympathy, as my writings attest—but I do not defend those who intentionally violate the laws of nations—or the sanctity of my home, and in fact, I very much equate the two.
By declaring this invasion (or any who violate our borders) as ‘hostile', he is covered. He should also cite and enforce the Supreme Court decision in “Wong Kim Ark” that parents must have residency and a domicile in the United States before their child is born to qualify for Birthright Citizenship.
If the invaders cannot show residency papers or legal domicile, then foreign eggs and sperm blended have no right to anything in the United States, only their own nations are responsible for those zygote(s) and children.
This has no affect on the rights of legal immigrants. They can apply at a port of entry and if accepted, their children will automatically become citizens when born on U.S. soil, but if not, the President can stop them, arrest them, imprison them, and send them back, with prejudice—meaning they can never return again or be considered for entry into the United States—and neither can any nappy-wearers they disgorge during their stay on President Trump’s soil. Period.
He has every right to do what he is doing, under law decided in the 1800s.
Congress needs to address all of these issues and update America's policies by law, ending any reasons for coming to America other than to benefit our nation. Further, are we to allow any and all to invade our nation, just because they have allowed their own leaders to impose less successful policies and stultifying Middle Age ideologies on them where they were born?
In answer, we should not. People need to sort out their own governments, not just flee them seeking ‘asylum’ in those that used human freedom and its inevitable results to their benefit.

Get rid of your dictators, and put these same ideas to work in your nations. The miracle can happen there, but for God’s sake, do not come to ours and try to change us. We’re fine. It’s you who have done this to yourselves, or allowed it. We revolted against it and used these simple ideas to create the greatest nation on earth. Why don’t you?

But as the law stands today, the President has every right to stop it if he words the order with the correct terminology.
Howell W. Woltz
Author of "Restoring America: by returning to its Constitution." Watch for Howell's new novel "The Lawyers Guild" which will be available in late November.


Jim Folds
11/5/2018 07:39:36 am
Insightful, well researched and enlightening. I hope those single issue voters focusing on immigration as a support for their vote will read this and think hard about what they do.

Note this too, you Kangaroo Courter...

ORDER HOWELL'S LATEST BOOK, "THE LAWYERS GUILD" TODAY- AVAILABLE ON AMAZON WORLDWIDE! https://www.amazon.com/Lawyers-Guild-Howell-Woltz-TEP/dp/1983564273/ref=sr_1_9?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1544968339&sr=1-9&keywords=Howell+Woltz

Through two presidential Administrations (Republican and Democrat), I was illegally held in prisons all over America-- for 87 months. I was moved 29 times to hide me from legal assistance. What did I do? I spoke out about the erosion of our freedoms and though never convicted of any crime by any court of jurisdiction, I lost everything--family, wealth, reputation, and all that most people hold dear.

In 2015 I moved to Eastern Europe to escape harassment under the Obama Administration, which threatened me with further imprisonment if I continued to speak out about the mass incarceration system. My book "Justice Restored: 10 steps to end mass incarceration in America" became an international bestseller in my absence, and I am pleased it is having an effect on the conversation (at the Trump White House), as I dearly love my country and what it once stood for-- Justice, Rule of Law, and Constitution--values abandoned by our courts.

Read rest of article here: https://www.howellwoltz.com/
2019-05-14 11:33:08 UTC
The hysteria continues, along with the associated hypocrisy*...

Donald Trump Contradicts Top Aides With Reversal After Putin Phone Call | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

*It's Leftist Liberals of the ilk of Maddow whose grandfathers actually spied for the Russians and would have sold America out to them should the circumstances have arisen!
2019-05-20 01:19:48 UTC
Climate change – where does the change agent reside that made our gullible/compliant governments accept the notion that CO2 is a pollutant which has a percentage atmospheric content that can be influenced by man?
CO2 is the heaviest gas in our atmosphere and is not well mixed for good reason.

Global Warming from CO2, All Politics – No Science!

Physicists, climatologists and meteorologists in recent times have not taken courses in thermodynamics so many don’t understand the first two laws of thermodynamics.

First Law: Energy can be changed from one form to another, but energy cannot be created or destroyed.

Second Law:Without additional energy input, heat can only be transferred from a hotter to cooler body, never vice versa. Our cooler atmosphere cannot radiate energy that will heat up earth’s warmer surface. Although all bodies in the universe radiate and absorb radiant energy, the warmer body always emits more energy than it receives back from a cooler body; a cooler body can never warm a warmer body.

Why is the education system brainwashing our children with “scientific” nonsense?

“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” – H. L. Mencken

Follow the yellow brick road!
2019-05-27 14:16:58 UTC
Attention SR Diamond...

A critique of the fraud of Stephen Jay Gould's 'Punctuated Equilibrium', violent "Leftist" cults organised around this and plenty more...

The liberal bias in science and other things

2019-06-29 09:58:03 UTC
Quoted Milton Friedman: "It is one thing to have immigration to jobs. It is another thing to have immigration to Welfare. And you cannot have both."

Good quote Edwin.


Can you tell Morrison that.


And more so when many have no intention of working and becoming integrated into the community.


They are indeed different, though both cause ruin, though in different ways. The former ruins the bargaining position of labor and the latter is economically ruinous to the nation.


I argued this a decade ago with a USA Left Globalist. The cunt (a ‘Jew’ rapidly liquidating his identity with a Mestizo missus as it turned out) was determined to deny the Law of Supply and Demand and the low wages equilibrium it undoubtedly produced in this case – with an associated declining manufacturing set-up!!!!!! That truth was decisive in Trump’s election which came much later. The fucking moron still doesn’t get it.
2019-06-30 02:41:59 UTC
Modern Bulgaria...falling apart, but still with infinitely more humanity than the Globalist Model, the USofA...

Bulgaria: The World's Fastest-Shrinking Country


On the Road in America

2019-07-01 07:54:14 UTC
5G - Weaponizing the Airwaves

What do you reckon?
2019-07-26 12:07:57 UTC
Starts about posn. 18

Trump's deep connection with notorious mafia lawyer and homosexual who died of AIDS...

Mafia Mentor: Where is Roy Cohn's Pretty Boy?

Many real and asserted connections...

BTW, no way Trump wrote 'Art of the Deal' - it was ghost written.

Incidentally, what is it about these Baptists that makes them look like they stepped out of a 50's copy of Readers' Digest?
2019-07-27 10:27:53 UTC
Post by t***@yahoo.com.au
Starts about posn. 18
Trump's deep connection with notorious mafia lawyer and homosexual who died of AIDS...
Mafia Mentor: Where is Roy Cohn's Pretty Boy?
Many real and asserted connections...
BTW, no way Trump wrote 'Art of the Deal' - it was ghost written.
Incidentally, what is it about these Baptists that makes them look like they stepped out of a 50's copy of Readers' Digest?
Cannot get this kind of analysis The Duran...from those who - formally - bow to the Orthodox Church, which - itself - is impeccable on Church origins and history...so have to go to a strand of Southern Baptists (!)...who, though well intentioned, only get half of it right...

Epstein's Austrian Passport Mystery: "Bringing the Best to Everyone We Touch"

2019-08-08 11:26:12 UTC
Beijing deems Hong Kong protests ‘Colour Revolution,’ will not rule out intervention

2019-08-08 11:31:15 UTC
Post by t***@yahoo.com.au
Beijing deems Hong Kong protests ‘Colour Revolution,’ will not rule out intervention
It's feasible because 20% (!) of China trade is with Hong Kong.
2019-08-09 23:23:25 UTC
Hope this cunt drowns...or worse...

Richard Gere delivers supplies to stranded "migrants"...